Judge blocks Trump’s move to dismantle consumer protection watchdog – US politics live | Trump administration


Judge blocks Trump from dismantling the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

A US judge has just issued a ruling blocking the Trump administration from dismantling the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a vital watchdog agency, the AP reports.

The US district judge Amy Berman Jackson’s ruling puts in place a preliminary injunction that maintains the agency’s existence while she considers the arguments of a lawsuit seeking to prevent the president’s decimation of the bureau. The judge said the court “can and must act” to save the CFPB from being shuttered, according to the AP.

The CFPB had been targeted for mass terminations, and employees were ordered to stop working last month after Donald Trump fired the bureau’s director. The current chief operating officer has said the agency was in “wind-down mode”. The president’s attacks on the bureau, which included canceling $100m in contracts and ordering immediate suspension of CFPB operations, have caused chaos, workers have testified.

The consumer watchdog is a popular US agency known for recovering more than $21bn for defrauded Americans. It was created after the 2008 financial crisis.

The judge on Friday ordered the CFPB to maintain a hotline for consumer complaints and provide office space for its employees or allow them to work remotely, according to Reuters.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Doge can continue cuts at US Agency for International Development, appeals court rules

A US appeals court has lifted an order blocking Elon Musk’s unofficial “department of government efficiency” (Doge) from making additional cuts at the US Agency for International Development (USAID).

The ruling comes in a lawsuit filed by former USAID employees against Musk, alleging Doge’s actions were unconstitutional given that Musk was not in a Senate-approved position or elected to office, the AP reports. A judge in a lower court ruled against Musk, finding Doge’s efforts to dismantle USAID were likely unconstitutional, but the fourth US circuit court of appeals disagreed, finding that while Doge played a role, the cuts were approved by government officials.

Musk had posted on social media that he “fed USAID into the wood chipper”, but the appeals court said that comment wasn’t legal proof that he was making the orders.

“While defendants’ role and actions related to USAID are not conventional, unconventional does not necessarily equal unconstitutional,” wrote Marvin Quattlebaum, a circuit judge appointed by Trump.

The lower court ruling by the US district judge Theodore Chuang in Maryland had ordered the Trump administration to restore computer access to USAID employees, but did not reverse firings.

Share

Updated at 




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *